Umbra Group / Studio / Risk Register
← Discovery Report v1.0 · USL-T10
Doc-IDUSL-T10
ClassificationInternal · Template
Versionv1.0 · 2026.04
OwnerUmbra Studio
Cross-phase · Template

Risk Register.

Living log of identified risks across the engagement: likelihood, impact, owner, mitigation, trigger, and status. Opened in Week 1; reviewed at every Gate.

Every Gate review closes or re-scores each open risk. Cannot carry a Red item past Gate 3.

Faithful mirror This HTML is a read-only projection of lighthouse-risk-register.xlsx. For filling in a live engagement, open the XLSX file.
§00

Workbook overview

This workbook contains 3 sheets. Each sheet below is rendered as a read-only table — for filling in a live engagement, open the XLSX version.

§01

Sheet · Risk Register

Sheet 1 of 3 · 17 rows
UMBRA STUDIO — RISK REGISTER
Lighthouse Sprint — Comprehensive Risk Tracking
Client:[Client name]
Sprint:[Project name]
Sprint Lead:[Name]
IDCategoryDescriptionProbability (1-5)Impact (1-5)Risk ScoreMitigation StrategyOwnerStatusDate IdentifiedDate Resolved
R01OrganizationalStakeholder resistance to workflow change — fear of job displacement or loss of control0[Engagement plan, early wins, training][Name]Open2026-04-21
R02TechnicalAPI rate limits on third-party integrations — inability to scale agent throughput0[Batch processing, queue strategy, vendor negotiation][Name]Open2026-04-21
R03OrganizationalScope creep — requests to automate additional workflows beyond the single target workflow0[Strict scope gate, change request process][Name]Open2026-04-21
R04TechnicalData quality insufficient for agent training — garbage in, garbage out0[Data audit, quality gates, manual review layer][Name]Open2026-04-21
R05OrganizationalKey stakeholder leaves during sprint — loss of SME context and decision authority0[Documentation, knowledge transfer sessions][Name]Open2026-04-21
R06ComplianceRegulatory compliance not fully understood — agent violates compliance rules mid-deployment0[Compliance audit, lawyer review, manual override gates][Name]Open2026-04-21
R07TimelineUnexpected system downtime or data access delays — blocks observation or testing0[Redundant access, early testing, fallback systems][Name]Open2026-04-21
R08BudgetCost overruns due to extended build time or additional tooling requirements0[Fixed-scope contract, regular budget reviews][Name]Open2026-04-21
R09TechnicalAgent performance degrades in production — latency, accuracy, or cost worse than baseline0[Performance benchmarks, gradual rollout, rollback plan][Name]Open2026-04-21
R10OrganizationalClient loses executive sponsorship — project deprioritized or defunded mid-sprint0[Regular stakeholder reviews, early wins communication][Name]Open2026-04-21
§02

Sheet · Risk Matrix

Sheet 2 of 3 · 13 rows
RISK MATRIX (5x5 Probability × Impact)
Probability \ Impact12345
112345
2246810
33691215
448121620
5510152025
Color Legend:
Green (1-5) — Low Risk
Yellow (6-12) — Medium Risk
Orange (13-20) — High Risk
Red (20+) — Critical Risk
§03

Sheet · Risk Categories

Sheet 3 of 3 · 7 rows
RISK CATEGORY DEFINITIONS
CategoryDefinitionExamples
TechnicalIssues with systems, APIs, data, or agent performance• API rate limits
• Data quality
• System downtime
• Integration failures
• Performance degradation
OrganizationalPeople, culture, change management, stakeholder alignment• Resistance to change
• Key person departure
• Scope creep
• Lack of sponsorship
• Training inadequacy
ComplianceRegulatory, audit, security, or legal constraints• Compliance violations
• Data privacy issues
• Audit failures
• Security breaches
TimelineSchedule delays, missed deadlines, pacing risks• Unexpected delays
• Resource unavailability
• Dependency blockages
• Compressed timelines
BudgetCost overruns, insufficient funding, resource constraints• Cost overruns
• Budget cuts
• Resource constraints
• Scope change impact